Summary Large Language Models and Causal Inference arxiv.org
8,292 words - PDF document - View PDF document
One Line
This article introduces a new dataset to test large language models' ability to infer causation from correlation and evaluates their performance, highlighting their limited causal inference skills and proposing a new dataset generation process.
Key Points
- Large language models have limited causal inference skills and perform poorly on the Corr2Cause task.
- A new dataset of 400K samples is proposed to test causal reasoning abilities and evaluate the performance of 17 LLMs.
- Directed graphical causal models (DGCMs) are used to represent causal relationships among variables.
- RoBERTa-Large MNLI is the best-performing model for causal inference, but identifying V-structure remains challenging.
- The authors suggest future work to enhance LLMs' skills with out-of-distribution perturbations and connect the benchmark to real-world false beliefs.
Summaries
144 word summary
This article discusses tests for the robustness of large language models in identifying spurious correlations in data. A new dataset, C ORR 2C AUSE, is introduced to test large language models' (LLMs) ability to infer causation from correlation. The paper presents a method for verbalizing causal relations between variables using natural language and evaluates the performance of various large language models on a dataset designed for causal inference. Large language models have limited causal inference skills, as shown by their poor performance on the Corr2Cause task. The authors propose a new dataset of 400K samples to test causal reasoning abilities and discuss the use of directed graphical causal models (DGCMs) to represent causal relationships among variables. The document presents a dataset generation process for large language models and causal inference, which involves constructing causal graphs using isomorphism checks, generating unique DAGs, and identifying MECs.
494 word summary
Large language models (LLMs) have limited causal inference skills, as shown by their poor performance on a novel task called Corr2Cause. The authors propose a new dataset of 400K samples to test causal reasoning abilities and argue that the ability to perform Corr2Cause inference is a must-have skill for LLMs. The document discusses the use of directed graphical causal models (DGCMs) to represent causal relationships among variables and evaluates the performance of seventeen LLMs on a dataset of over 400K samples. The authors suggest future work to explore ways to enhance the skill of LLMs with out-of-distribution perturbations. Furthermore, they explore whether LLMs can learn the skill through finetuning, but find that they still perform close to the random baseline. The document presents a dataset generation process for large language models and causal inference, which involves constructing causal graphs using isomorphism checks, generating unique DAGs, and identifying MECs. The focus is on smaller graphs with up to 6 nodes, and the dataset statistics are provided in Table 1. The paper presents a method for verbalizing causal relations between variables using natural language. It focuses on six common causal relations and identifies statistical correlations to determine if variables are independent or correlated based on d-separation sets. The article discusses experiments performed on various large language models to test their performance on a dataset designed for causal inference. The best-performing model is RoBERTa-Large MNLI. The study also identifies the V-structure as the most challenging causal relationship to identify. The authors suggest future studies should use out-of-distribution data as a test set to benchmark LLMs' performance in causal inference. The study proposes two robustness tests to determine the models' ability to learn causal inference skills, with RoBERTa-Large MNLI being the best-performing model. A new dataset, C ORR 2C AUSE, is introduced to test large language models' (LLMs) ability to infer causation from correlation. The authors evaluate an extensive list of LLMs on this new task and show that off-the-shelf LLMs perform poorly. They recommend using this dataset to benchmark the causal inference skills for LLMs and welcome future work to connect the idea of this benchmark to more real-world false beliefs based on confusing correlation with causation. The document also references various papers and conferences related to language models, causal inference, and natural language processing, as well as different language models and their pretraining approaches. Finally, the authors provide details on their implementation of GPT-based models for finetuning data. This article discusses tests for the robustness of large language models, including paraphrasing and variable refactorization, to identify spurious correlations in data. The authors use verbalization templates to form hypotheses for six causal relations and report the point-wise mutual information between the label and n-grams with no more than four tokens. The authors train the models until convergence, using a batch size of 8 and tuning the learning rate on the validation set. They use the finetuning API for non-BERT models and the transformers library for BERT-based models.
1515 word summary
The article discusses robustness tests for large language models, including paraphrasing and variable refactorization, to check for spurious correlations in data. The authors use verbalization templates to compose hypotheses for six causal relations and report the point-wise mutual information between the label and n-grams with no more than four tokens. The authors train the models until convergence, using a batch size of 8 and tuning the learning rate on the validation set. They use the finetuning API for non-BERT models and the transformers library for BERT-based models. This document discusses the use of large language models for causal inference, with a focus on GPT-based models. Various papers and resources related to natural language processing, causal discovery, and machine learning are cited throughout the document. The authors provide details on their implementation of GPT-based models for finetuning data. This document references various papers and conferences related to language models, causal inference, and natural language processing. The papers include studies on commonsense reasoning about social interactions, counterfactual story reasoning and generation, and modeling semantic containment and exclusion in natural language inference. The document also mentions different language models, such as BERT, RoBERTa, and DistilBERT, and their pretraining approaches. Additionally, it includes references to books on causal inference and practical graph isomorphism. Finally, the document highlights the GPT-4 technical report and a framework for adversarial attacks, data augmentation, and adversarial training in NLP. Large language models are being used for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. The BART model is a denoising sequence-to-sequence language model that opens up new possibilities for causality. Causal reasoning and large graphical models are being used to detect logical fallacies. Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models is being explored. Bert with disentangled attention and Deberta are being used for decoding-enhanced deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. The pascal recognizing textual entailment challenge is being used to evaluate predictive uncertainty and visual object classification. Language models are few-shot learners. This paper discusses the limited reasoning abilities of current large language models (LLMs) and the difficulty of separating actual reasoning from training-corpus-derived knowledge. The authors introduce a new task, C ORR 2C AUSE, to infer causation from correlation, and collect a large-scale dataset of more than 400K samples. They evaluate an extensive list of LLMs on this new task and show that off-the-shelf LLMs perform poorly. The authors recommend using this dataset to benchmark the pure causal inference skills for LLMs that have not seen this dataset and welcome future work to connect the idea of this benchmark to more real-world false beliefs based on confusing correlation with causation. The paper discusses the development of a new dataset, C ORR 2C AUSE, which tests the ability of large language models (LLMs) to infer causal relationships between variables. This task is unique from other inference tasks, such as natural language inference (NLI), as it focuses solely on causal inference skills. The paper also identifies limitations of the current work and future directions for research. The authors provide a fine-grained analysis of the best-performing model, RoBERTa-Large MNLI, on the C ORR 2C AUSE dataset. Additionally, they suggest accompanying adversarial attacks with i.i.d. testing to improve the generalizability of finetuned models. The study focuses on analyzing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in causal inference, specifically in identifying causal relationships between variables. The authors propose two robustness tests to determine the models' ability to learn causal inference skills. The first test involves paraphrasing the hypothesis, while the second test involves variable refactorization. The results show that the models are relatively robust, with F1 scores over 70% for most classes, except for Is-Ancestor and Is-Descendant. The best-performing model is RoBERTa-Large MNLI, which is especially sensitive towards paraphrasing but maintains a high F1 score of 67.87 under variable refactorization.
The study also identifies the V-structure as the most challenging causal relationship to identify, requiring identification of both unconditional independence and collider relations. The model performs well in judging relations such as Is-Parent, Is-Descendant, and Has-Confounder, with F1 scores over 96%. The authors suggest future studies should use out-of-distribution data as a test set to benchmark LLMs' performance in causal inference. The study adopts the common setup of text adversarial attack to test the models' robustness and provides a template for each causal relation to some semantically-equivalent alternatives. Finally, the study analyzes the performance of finetuned models on the original test set and perturbed test sets by paraphrasing and variable refactorization. The document discusses the performance of various language models on a causal inference task. The models tested include BERT-Base, GPT-3 Davinci, GPT-3 Curie, GPT-3 Babbage, GPT-3 Ada, and RoBERTa-Large MNLI. The best-performing model was RoBERTa-Large MNLI. The document also includes a fine-grained analysis of the models' performance by causal relation type. Overall, pure causal inference is a challenging task for language models, with most models performing worse than random guessing. The document also mentions more efficient models, such as LLaMa and Alpaca. The article discusses experiments performed on various large language models (LLMs) to test their performance on a dataset designed for causal inference. The LLMs evaluated include GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and various BERT-based models. The dataset used in the experiments is called C ORR 2C AUSE and contains hypotheses with varying numbers of nodes and causal relations. The statistics of the dataset are provided in Table 3. The experiments involve testing the LLMs on the dataset and comparing their performance, with results presented in Table 1. The article also includes a table of hypothesis templates for each causal relation. The paper discusses a method for verbalizing causal relations between variables using natural language. The method involves identifying statistical correlations and determining if the variables are independent or correlated based on d-separation sets. Six common causal relations are focused on, and hypotheses are composed and labeled based on the validity of the proposed causal relationship. The graphs are clustered into MECs using d-separation sets. The method is based on a faithfulness assumption and uses a graph-theoretic algorithm to check for chain, fork, and collider structures. The document presents a dataset generation process for large language models and causal inference. The process involves constructing causal graphs using isomorphism checks, generating unique DAGs, and identifying MECs. The dataset is based on concepts of causal inference and includes a task formulation for mapping correlation statements and causal hypotheses to their validity. The focus is on smaller graphs with up to 6 nodes, and the dataset statistics are provided in Table 1. The process is described in detail, including specific steps and their descriptions. This document introduces a dataset construction method that aims to infer causation from correlations. The construction process involves selecting a closed system of variables, mapping each graph to a set of statistical correlations, and using the Peter-Clark algorithm to identify causal relationships among variables. The document explains that while there is a one-to-many mapping between causal graphs and statistical distributions, they can be organized into Markov equivalence classes. The goal of the dataset construction is to provide a basis for large language models to learn causal inference. This document discusses large language models (LLMs) and causal inference, focusing on the use of directed graphical causal models (DGCMs) to represent causal relationships among variables. The Markov property and D-separation are fundamental concepts in graphical models used to determine conditional independence between variables. The document evaluates the performance of seventeen LLMs on a dataset of over 400K samples, finding that all of them perform poorly on pure causal inference. The authors suggest future work to explore ways to enhance the skill of LLMs with out-of-distribution perturbations. Furthermore, they explore whether LLMs can learn the skill through finetuning, but find that they still perform close to the random baseline. The document proposes a new task for large language models (LLMs) called Corr2Cause, which tests their ability to infer causation from correlation. The authors show that existing LLMs do not perform well on this task and propose a new dataset of 400K samples to test causal reasoning abilities. The dataset is grounded in the formal framework of causal discovery and provides rules about when it is valid or invalid to infer causation from correlation. The authors argue that the ability to perform Corr2Cause inference is a must-have skill for LLMs and a fundamental building block for deducing causal relationships. The code and data for the dataset are available online. Causal inference is a crucial aspect of human intelligence and involves establishing causal relationships between variables or events. Large language models (LLMs) have limited causal inference skills, as shown by their poor performance on a novel task called C ORR 2C AUSE. This task involves determining the causal relationship between a set of correlational statements. Existing causal inference datasets in natural language processing rely on discovering causality from empirical knowledge, whereas this task tests LLMs' pure causal inference skills. Through experiments on a large-scale dataset of more than 400K samples, the study identifies seventeen existing LLMs' shortcomings in performing causal inference, even after finetuning. The study highlights the need for improving LLMs' pure reasoning skills and generalizability to guide future research in this area.