Summary Sasha Issenberg - The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns - 11/14/12 (Youtube) youtu.be
14,421 words - YouTube video - View YouTube video
One Line
Data and behavioral science have revolutionized political campaigns, enabling tailored voter strategies and experimental approaches that are more effective at boosting voter turnout than traditional methods.
Slides
Slide Presentation (10 slides)
Key Points
- Data and behavioral science have transformed modern political campaigns, allowing them to understand and target individual voters
- Campaigns have gained access to vast databases of personal information to build detailed voter profiles and predict their behavior
- Randomized field experiments have shown the effectiveness of personal interactions like door-to-door canvassing in increasing voter turnout
- The Obama campaign's data-driven, experimental approach was a key factor in its success in 2012, while the Romney campaign's reliance on traditional measures of "enthusiasm" failed to account for the power of mobilization
- The political profession has been resistant to innovation, with campaigns often lacking the ability to honestly evaluate their successes and failures, but more durable institutions like labor unions and academic researchers have been drivers of innovation
Summaries
21 word summary
Data and behavioral science have transformed political campaigns. Tailored voter strategies and experimental approaches boost turnout more effectively than traditional methods.
55 word summary
Sasha Issenberg's "The Victory Lab" reveals how data and behavioral science have revolutionized political campaigns. Campaigns now leverage voter profiles to develop tailored strategies. The Obama campaign's data-driven, experimental approach in 2012 boosted turnout more effectively than traditional methods. Embracing data-driven, experimental strategies is key to breaking the cycle of inertia in the political profession.
126 word summary
Sasha Issenberg's "The Victory Lab" explores how data and behavioral science have transformed modern political campaigns. Campaigns now leverage detailed voter profiles to develop tailored strategies for each individual. The Obama campaign's data-driven, experimental approach in 2012 allowed them to "hack" voters' decision-making and boost turnout more effectively than traditional methods. Behavioral research shows personal interactions like door-to-door canvassing are more effective at turning non-voters into voters than impersonal tactics. However, the political profession has been resistant to innovation, relying on outdated tactics. Durable institutions like unions and academia have driven campaign innovation by testing and evaluating new approaches. The author argues the next frontier is optimizing volunteer use for persuasion, not just mobilization. Embracing data-driven, experimental strategies is key to breaking the cycle of inertia.
349 word summary
Sasha Issenberg's book "The Victory Lab" explores how data and behavioral science have transformed modern political campaigns. Campaigns now have access to vast databases of personal information, allowing them to build detailed voter profiles and assess their likelihood of supporting a candidate or turning out to vote. Parallel to this, political scientists have pioneered the use of randomized field experiments to test the real-world impact of different campaign tactics.
These insights have enabled campaigns to move beyond broad demographic targeting and develop tailored strategies for each individual voter. The Obama campaign's success in 2012 was attributed in part to their data-driven, experimental approach, which allowed them to "hack" voters' decision-making processes and turn out their supporters more effectively.
The 2012 election saw a continued increase in voter turnout, driven by the application of behavioral science insights to mobilize and engage voters. Experiments have shown that personal interactions, like door-to-door canvassing, are more effective at turning non-voters into voters than impersonal methods like TV ads or call centers.
In contrast, the Republican campaign seemed to rely more on traditional measures of "enthusiasm" that failed to account for the power of mobilization. The key insight from behavioral research is that persuasion (changing minds) and mobilization (changing behavior) are distinct processes, and the Obama campaign understood this distinction.
The political profession has been resistant to innovation, with many campaigns relying on outdated tactics despite research showing their ineffectiveness. This is partly due to the short-term nature of political campaigns, as well as the incentives of consultants and vendors to continue selling the same services.
More durable institutions like labor unions and academic researchers have been drivers of innovation in political campaigning, as they have the resources and longevity to invest in testing and evaluating different tactics. The author suggests that the next frontier in campaign innovation will be in optimizing the use of volunteers for persuasion, rather than just mobilization.
Overall, the author's key point is that the political profession needs to embrace data-driven, experimental approaches to campaign strategy in order to break the cycle of inertia and adopt more effective tactics.
590 word summary
Sasha Issenberg's book "The Victory Lab" explores how data and behavioral science have transformed modern political campaigns. Behind the scenes, a new breed of "geeks" are using data and experiments to understand voters at an individual level and develop targeted strategies to mobilize and persuade them.
Campaigns have gained access to vast databases of personal information, allowing them to build detailed voter profiles and assess their likelihood of supporting a candidate or turning out to vote. Parallel to this, political scientists have pioneered the use of randomized field experiments to test the real-world impact of different campaign tactics. These insights have enabled campaigns to move beyond broad demographic targeting and develop tailored strategies for each individual voter.
Issenberg argues that this data-driven, experimental approach was a key factor in the Obama campaign's success in 2012. While the public narrative focused on issues and candidate personalities, the campaign's "geeks" were working behind the scenes to hack voters' decision-making processes and turn out their supporters.
The 2012 election saw a continued increase in voter turnout, driven in part by the application of behavioral science insights by campaigns to more effectively mobilize and engage voters. Experiments have shown that personal interactions, like door-to-door canvassing, are more effective at turning non-voters into voters than impersonal methods like TV ads or call centers.
The Republican campaign, in contrast, seemed to rely more on traditional measures of "enthusiasm" that failed to account for the power of mobilization. The key insight from behavioral research is that persuasion (changing minds) and mobilization (changing behavior) are distinct processes, and the Obama campaign understood this distinction.
The political profession has been resistant to innovation, with many campaigns relying on outdated tactics despite research showing their ineffectiveness. Campaigns often lack the ability to honestly evaluate their successes and failures, with winning campaigns attributing their victory to specific tactical decisions while losing campaigns blame external factors.
One reason for this is that political campaigns are essentially short-term startups, existing solely to win on a single day in November. The candidate, who is often inexperienced in overseeing a large marketing operation, has little incentive to invest in research or innovation during the campaign. Consultants and vendors, meanwhile, have an incentive to continue selling the same services even if they are known to be ineffective.
In contrast, more durable institutions like labor unions and academic researchers have been drivers of innovation in political campaigning. These groups have the resources and longevity to invest in testing and evaluating different tactics, and can leverage their budgets to compel consultants to adopt more effective approaches.
The author suggests that the next frontier in campaign innovation will be in optimizing the use of volunteers for persuasion, rather than just mobilization. Campaigns are beginning to model which voters are most likely to be persuaded by volunteer outreach, and which volunteers are best suited for that task. However, this requires a cultural shift, as many campaigns have traditionally been wary of putting volunteers in situations where they may have to engage in substantive political debates.
Overall, the author's key point is that the political profession has been slow to learn from research and data, and that breaking this cycle of inertia will require more durable institutions that are willing to invest in innovation and testing, even if the lessons may not pay off immediately. The success of the Obama campaign's use of technology and data-driven tactics suggests that this approach can yield significant dividends, but it remains to be seen how widely it will be adopted across the political landscape.
1215 word summary
Sasha Issenberg's book "The Victory Lab" explores how data and behavioral science have transformed modern political campaigns. Issenberg, a journalist who covered the 2008 presidential election, realized that the public narrative of campaigns focused on big events and candidate speeches only captured a small part of what was really happening.
Behind the scenes, a new breed of "geeks" were using data and experiments to understand voters at an individual level and develop targeted strategies to mobilize and persuade them. These innovations came from two main sources - the commercial world of consumer marketing, and the academic field of social science.
From the commercial sector, campaigns gained access to vast databases of personal information that allowed them to build detailed profiles of individual voters. This went far beyond the basic voter registration data campaigns had previously relied on. By linking voter files to commercial data, they could assess a voter's likelihood of supporting a candidate or turning out to vote based on factors like magazine subscriptions, consumer purchases, and even whether they had a pool installed.
Parallel to this, political scientists were pioneering the use of randomized field experiments to test the real-world impact of different campaign tactics. Seminal studies showed that personal door-to-door contact was far more effective at increasing turnout than impersonal methods like mailers or phone calls. Other experiments revealed the power of "social pressure" - simply informing voters that their neighbors' turnout records were public information boosted participation.
These insights allowed campaigns to move beyond broad demographic targeting and instead develop tailored strategies for each individual voter. They could identify the most persuadable voters, craft messages to appeal to their specific interests, and efficiently allocate resources to maximize their impact.
Issenberg argues that this data-driven, experimental approach to campaigning was a key factor in the Obama campaign's success in 2012. While the public narrative focused on issues and candidate personalities, the campaign's "geeks" were working behind the scenes to hack voters' decision-making processes and turn out their supporters.
The book's detailed account of these innovations provides a fascinating glimpse into the modern political landscape. Issenberg shows how the combination of big data and behavioral science has fundamentally changed the way campaigns operate, moving them beyond the simplistic "one big thing" model that has long dominated political reporting.
As Issenberg notes, this new era of campaigning raises important questions about privacy, manipulation, and the role of technology in democracy. But it also represents a significant advancement in our understanding of voter behavior and how to translate that knowledge into electoral success. "The Victory Lab" is an essential read for anyone seeking to comprehend the complex realities of 21st century politics.
The 2012 election saw a continued increase in voter turnout, despite widespread cynicism towards political leadership and the political process. This was driven in part by the application of behavioral science insights by campaigns to more effectively mobilize and engage voters.
Campaigns have developed the ability to individually target voters, using data and experiments to predict their likely behavior and attitudes. This has allowed them to tailor their persuasion and mobilization efforts in more nuanced ways. Experiments have shown that personal interactions, like door-to-door canvassing, are more effective at turning non-voters into voters than impersonal methods like TV ads or call centers.
The Republican campaign, in contrast, seemed to rely more on traditional measures of "enthusiasm" that failed to account for the power of mobilization. They assumed the electorate would look more like 2010, when Republicans were more enthusiastic, without recognizing that campaigns can systematically increase turnout through targeted outreach and psychological interventions.
The key insight from behavioral research is that persuasion (changing minds) and mobilization (changing behavior) are distinct processes. Providing more information or arguments does not necessarily increase turnout, but specific psychological techniques can boost an individual's likelihood of voting, even if they are not enthusiastic about the candidates.
The Obama campaign understood this distinction and invested heavily in the infrastructure to facilitate meaningful voter interactions, like field offices and volunteer training. In contrast, the Romney campaign was skeptical of the value of these ground game efforts, viewing them as just "leases" rather than a way to activate potential voters.
While the effectiveness of tactics like yard signs is hard to measure, they can serve other purposes, like satisfying volunteers or gathering voter data. Smart campaigns recognize these peripheral benefits and use them to build relationships with supporters, even if the direct impact on votes is unclear.
Overall, the 2012 election highlighted the growing sophistication of campaigns in applying behavioral science insights to voter mobilization. By focusing on creating meaningful interactions and modifying behavior rather than just persuasion, they were able to increase turnout, even in an environment of political cynicism. This represents an important shift in how campaigns approach the challenge of engaging the electorate.
The political profession has been resistant to innovation, with many campaigns relying on outdated tactics despite research showing their ineffectiveness. Campaigns often lack the ability to honestly evaluate their successes and failures, with winning campaigns attributing their victory to specific tactical decisions while losing campaigns blame external factors. This insulates campaigns from being proven wrong and perpetuates a cycle of inertia.
One reason for this is that political campaigns are essentially short-term startups, existing solely to win on a single day in November. The candidate, who is often inexperienced in overseeing a large marketing operation, has little incentive to invest in research or innovation during the campaign. Consultants and vendors, meanwhile, have an incentive to continue selling the same services even if they are known to be ineffective.
In contrast, more durable institutions like labor unions and academic researchers have been drivers of innovation in political campaigning. These groups have the resources and longevity to invest in testing and evaluating different tactics, and can leverage their budgets to compel consultants to adopt more effective approaches.
The author cites the failures of the Romney campaign's "Project Orca" as an example of this dynamic. Orca was an ambitious effort to digitize the campaign's get-out-the-vote operation, but it was plagued by poor planning, testing, and execution. More importantly, the Romney campaign seemed to view Orca as a substitute for a real mobilization program, rather than a complement to it. This reflected a fundamental misunderstanding of how to effectively engage and turn out voters on Election Day.
The author suggests that the next frontier in campaign innovation will be in optimizing the use of volunteers for persuasion, rather than just mobilization. Campaigns are beginning to model which voters are most likely to be persuaded by volunteer outreach, and which volunteers are best suited for that task. However, this requires a cultural shift, as many campaigns have traditionally been wary of putting volunteers in situations where they may have to engage in substantive political debates.
Overall, the author's key point is that the political profession has been slow to learn from research and data, and that breaking this cycle of inertia will require more durable institutions that are willing to invest in innovation and testing, even if the lessons may not pay off immediately. The success of the Obama campaign's use of technology and data-driven tactics suggests that this approach can yield significant dividends, but it remains to be seen how widely it will be adopted across the political landscape.