Summary My Problem with Scorsese’s Omens for Film | by Shelby Fielding | Sep, 2023 | Fanfare fanfare.pub
900 words - html page - View html page
One Line
The author evaluates Scorsese's emphasis on crime, lack of diversity, and acknowledges his impact on cinema.
Slides
Slide Presentation (8 slides)
Key Points
- Martin Scorsese is seen as an authority on film, but no one should have a monopoly on what art should or shouldn't be.
- The author is not a fan of Scorsese's focus on the criminality of the American underbelly and moral decay.
- The author acknowledges Scorsese's contributions to cinema and diverse voices in the industry.
- The author's problem is with the notion that Scorsese's celebrated craft grants him authority in art.
- Scorsese claimed in an interview that the film industry is no longer interested in supporting individual voices expressing personal thoughts and ideas.
Summaries
17 word summary
The author critiques Scorsese's focus on crime and lack of diversity, while recognizing his contributions to cinema.
64 word summary
The author criticizes Martin Scorsese's focus on the criminal underbelly of America and moral decay, noting the lack of diversity in his work. However, they acknowledge his contributions to cinema and support for film restorations. The main issue is with the idea that Scorsese's craft grants him authority in the industry, emphasizing the importance of valuing diversity and rejecting the power to dictate art.
141 word summary
The author expresses their problem with Martin Scorsese's authority in the film industry, specifically his focus on the criminal underbelly of America and moral decay. They acknowledge that this is a personal preference and not a critique of Scorsese's legacy. The author also notes the lack of diversity in Scorsese's work, with non-white and non-straight characters being underrepresented. However, they recognize Scorsese's contributions to cinema through his non-profit organization and support for film restorations. The main issue the author has is with the idea that Scorsese's celebrated craft grants him authority in the industry. They disagree with the notion that no one has a monopoly on what art should be. The author concludes by emphasizing the importance of valuing diversity and individual voices in filmmaking, rejecting the idea that anyone should have the power to dictate what art should look like.
268 word summary
In this article, the author expresses their problem with Martin Scorsese's authority in the film industry. They admit to not being a fan of Scorsese's work, particularly his focus on the criminal underbelly of America and moral decay. However, they acknowledge that this is a personal preference and not a criticism of Scorsese's legacy as a filmmaker.
The author also addresses the lack of diversity in Scorsese's work, noting that there is a troubling pattern of non-white and non-straight characters being underrepresented. Despite this, they acknowledge that Scorsese has made contributions to the world of cinema through his non-profit organization and support for film restorations.
The main issue the author has with Scorsese is the idea that his celebrated craft grants him authority in the industry. They reference an interview where Scorsese claimed that the film industry is over and studios are no longer interested in supporting individual voices. The author disagrees with this notion, arguing that no one has a monopoly on what art should or shouldn't be.
The author concludes by stating that Scorsese's legacy should not be equated with a sense of authority in art. They believe that diversity and individual voices should be valued in the film industry, and that no one should have the power to dictate what art should look like.
Overall, the author's problem with Scorsese's omens for film stems from their belief that no one should have a monopoly on what art should be. They disagree with the idea that Scorsese's legacy grants him authority in the industry, and argue for the importance of diversity and individual voices in filmmaking.