Summary 🌀 Towards Complex Reasoning: the Polaris of Large Language Models yaofu.notion.site
4,201 words - html page - View html page
One Line
The text highlights the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and explores various techniques for enhancing their capabilities, including prompt engineering and in-context learning, while also discussing evaluation methods such as chain-of-thought prompting and identifying GPT-4 as excelling in complex reasoning tasks.
Slides
Slide Presentation (8 slides)
Key Points
- Complex reasoning is crucial for large language models to become next-generation computation platforms.
- Training models with strong complex reasoning capabilities involves pretraining/continue training, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning.
- Prompt engineering techniques, such as chain-of-thought prompting, can elicit reasoning in large language models.
- Training language models on code can improve their reasoning abilities.
- Evaluating language models' reasoning abilities involves considering data formats, types of abilities (knowledge and reasoning), and types of models (pretrained and instruction-tuned).
- In-context chain-of-thought is recommended for evaluating pretrained checkpoints to better reveal the model's potential.
- GPT-4 outperforms other models on complex reasoning tasks, suggesting that larger models have an advantage in this area.
- Complex reasoning serves as the foundation for language models to become next-generation computation platforms or operating systems.
Summaries
82 word summary
This summary discusses the significance of complex reasoning in large language models and approaches for enhancing their capabilities. It emphasizes techniques such as prompt engineering and in-context learning. Evaluating reasoning abilities involves considering data formats, types of abilities, and models. The use of chain-of-thought prompting is proposed for evaluating pretrained checkpoints. GPT-4 is identified as excelling in complex reasoning tasks. The summary provides a concise overview of the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and their development and evaluation methods.
272 word summary
The summary delves into the significance of complex reasoning in large language models and the approaches for enhancing their reasoning capabilities. It covers the stages of pretraining, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning in improving these models' reasoning skills. Training on code is suggested as a means to enhance reasoning abilities. Prompt engineering techniques like chain-of-thought prompting are recommended to elicit reasoning in large language models.
Advanced techniques and analytics, such as least-to-most prompting and progressive-hint prompting, are highlighted for improving reasoning performance. In-context learning and prompt engineering are emphasized for enhancing model performance. Evaluating reasoning abilities involves considering data formats, types of abilities, and types of models.
For evaluating pretrained checkpoints, the summary proposes the use of in-context chain-of-thought as it reveals the model's potential. Chain-of-thought prompting is found to be more effective than answer-only prompting for reasoning tasks. The summary introduces the chain-of-thought hub as a platform for evaluating language models' reasoning abilities.
GPT-4 is identified as excelling in complex reasoning tasks compared to other models, while smaller models lag behind. The GitHub repository includes detailed experimental setup and result analysis for reproducing GPT and Claude's results.
Complex reasoning is deemed crucial for next-generation computation platforms with stronger language models. The recipe for building models with strong reasoning abilities involves pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. The post also delves into advanced prompting engineering techniques and the evaluation of models' reasoning abilities. The Chain-of-thought Hub is introduced as an ongoing effort towards unified evaluation.
Overall, the summary provides a concise overview of the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and the methods for developing and evaluating their reasoning abilities.
285 word summary
The summary explores the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and the methods for developing and evaluating their reasoning abilities. It discusses the stages of pretraining, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning in improving large language models' reasoning. Training on code can enhance reasoning abilities. Prompt engineering techniques such as chain-of-thought prompting are recommended to elicit reasoning in large language models.
The summary highlights the use of advanced techniques and analytics, such as least-to-most prompting and progressive-hint prompting, to improve reasoning performance. It also emphasizes the importance of in-context learning and prompt engineering in enhancing the model's performance. Evaluating reasoning abilities involves considering data formats, types of abilities, and types of models.
The summary suggests using in-context chain-of-thought for evaluating pretrained checkpoints as it reveals the model's potential. Chain-of-thought prompting is found to be more effective than answer-only prompting for reasoning tasks. The summary introduces the chain-of-thought hub as a platform for evaluating language models' reasoning abilities.
GPT-4 is identified as outperforming other models in complex reasoning tasks, while smaller models lag behind. The GitHub repository includes detailed experimental setup and result analysis for reproducing GPT and Claude's results.
Complex reasoning is seen as crucial for stronger language models to become next-generation computation platforms. The recipe for building models with strong reasoning abilities involves pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. The post also discusses advanced prompting engineering techniques and the evaluation of models' reasoning abilities. The Chain-of-thought Hub is introduced as an ongoing effort towards unified evaluation.
Overall, the summary provides a concise overview of the main ideas discussed in the original text, focusing on the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and the methods for developing and evaluating their reasoning abilities.
622 word summary
The summary discusses the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and how it differentiates them from smaller models. Complex reasoning is seen as a key factor in making language models the next-generation computation platform. The post explores methods for training models with strong complex reasoning capabilities, prompt engineering techniques for complex tasks, and evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models.
In the section on improving large language models reasoning, the text highlights the stages of pretraining/continue training, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning. It also mentions the correlation between reasoning and coding, stating that training on code can improve reasoning abilities.
The section on prompt engineering for complex tasks discusses the use of chain-of-thought prompting to elicit reasoning in large language models. It recommends papers on chain-of-thought prompting and self-consistency to understand how to effectively prompt the models.
Overall, the summary provides a concise overview of the main ideas discussed in the original text, focusing on the importance of complex reasoning in large language models and the methods for developing and evaluating their reasoning abilities.
Majority voting improves reasoning performance on challenging tasks. Advanced techniques and analytics involve complex chains, least-to-most prompting, decomposed prompting, and progressive-hint prompting. Prompting the language model in the style of code can improve its performance on natural language reasoning tasks. Finetuning the model enhances its in-context learning capabilities. In-context learning works by making the model enter the corresponding task mode based on the examples in the prompt. Prompting and chain-of-thought are more influenced by the form rather than the meaning of the prompt. Language models can experience hallucination snowballing, where they make subsequent false claims based on early mistakes. Refinement and feedback through self-refinement and learning performance-improving code edits can improve model performance. Evaluating language models reasoning abilities involves considering data formats, types of abilities (knowledge and reasoning), and types of models (pretrained and instruction-tuned). Chain-of-thought performs better than answer-only for reasoning tasks, while for knowledge tasks, chain-of-thought performs similarly to answer-only. Pretrained checkpoints have in-context learning abilities, while instruction-tuned checkpoints have both zero-shot and in-context prompting abilities.
We recommend using in-context chain-of-thought for evaluating pretrained checkpoints because it better reveals the model's potential. Zero-shot evaluation may underestimate model performance, especially for models that do not support a step-by-step chain-of-thought. Chain-of-thought prompting fully releases the model's reasoning performance compared to answer-only prompting.
Introducing the chain-of-thought hub, an ongoing effort as a unified platform for evaluating language models' reasoning abilities. A list of complex reasoning tasks, including math, science, symbolic, and knowledge-based tasks, is compiled to measure which models perform better. The leaderboard provides a quick glance at the rankings, although many numbers are yet to be filled.
GPT-4 outperforms all other models on the GSM8K and MMLU tasks, while Claude is the only model family comparable to the GPT family. Smaller models like Flan-T5 11B and LLaMA 7B lag behind in complex reasoning, suggesting that large models have an advantage in this area. The GitHub repository includes detailed experimental setup and result analysis, as well as scripts for reproducing all results of GPT and Claude.
Complex reasoning is crucial for stronger language models and serves as the foundation for them to become next-generation computation platforms or operating systems. The recipe for building models with strong reasoning abilities involves pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning. There is a close relationship between reasoning and coding, as improving reasoning follows a similar recipe to improving coding.
Advanced prompting engineering techniques and analytics of model behavior when performing complex reasoning are discussed. The evaluation of models' reasoning abilities is addressed, and the Chain-of-thought Hub is introduced as an ongoing effort towards unified evaluation. The post aims to serve as a roadmap for building open-sourced models with strong reasoning abilities.