Summary Limits of Transformers on Compositionality arxiv.org
20,179 words - PDF document - View PDF document
One Line
Transformers have limitations in handling complex, multi-step reasoning tasks and compositional operations, struggling with generalization, precise compositional reasoning, and planning multiple steps for overall correct reasoning.
Slides
Slide Presentation (7 slides)
Key Points
- Transformers have limitations in handling complex, multi-step reasoning tasks and compositional operations.
- Transformers struggle to generalize beyond the complexity seen in the training data and often collapse the depth of compositional operations.
- Transformers excel in low-complexity tasks but struggle with higher complexity and out-of-distribution cases.
- Transformers rely on pattern matching rather than general reasoning and have weaknesses in tasks that require true multi-step compositional operations.
- Transformers may have inherent limitations in solving high-complexity compositional tasks and further research is needed to address these limitations.
Summary
861 word summary
Understanding the limitations of Transformers in compositional reasoning is crucial for developing more reliable and robust AI systems. This knowledge is essential for researchers, developers, and policymakers in making informed decisions regarding the application of Transformers in various domains. By shedding light on these limitations, we contribute to a deeper understanding of the capabilities and constraints of these models. Our work on analyzing the limitations of current Transformers in compositional tasks can have a positive societal impact in several ways. It can guide future research efforts toward addressing these limitations and developing models that exhibit improved performance in handling complex tasks requiring compositional reasoning. We do not foresee any negative societal impacts, as our analysis aims to understand the reasons behind transformers' failures and successes, but does not introduce any new model or dataset. Future work may leverage our findings to direct further research towards the development of more reliable and robust AI systems. The text excerpt is from a document titled "Limits of Transformers on Compositionality" and contains mathematical equations and results. The content is highly technical and specific to the topic of the document, making it difficult to provide a concise summary without losing important details. We conducted experiments using different data splits, including problem size, depth, and width of the graph. The model was fine-tuned on various tasks, such as multiplication, dynamic programming, and puzzles. We evaluated the performance of different language models, including GPT4, ChatGPT, LLaMA, and FlanT5. The results showed a lack of generalization for out-of-domain examples and a decline in performance as the task complexity increased. We also examined the zero-shot and few-shot accuracy of the models. The cost of fine-tuning GPT3 for the multiplication task was approximately $12 million for four epochs on question-answer pairs. Overall, our experiments highlighted the limitations of transformers in terms of compositionality and generalization to out-of-domain examples. The excerpt is from a document discussing the limits of transformers on compositionality. It includes a sample scratchpad for a puzzle task, a final solution to the puzzle, and a step-by-step reasoning process. The document also mentions the use of different clue types and the construction of data for experiments. It provides information about the multiplication task, including an example prompt and scratchpad, as well as the process of multiplying two numbers. The document includes appendices with additional information and references to related works. The text excerpt is a list of references from a document on the limits of transformers on compositionality. The references include various papers and books related to language models, reasoning, problem-solving, and neural networks. The list is quite long and contains many irrelevant details and repetitions. A more concise version of the summary would be as follows:
The text excerpt consists of a list of references from a document on the limits of transformers on compositionality. The references include papers and books related to language models, reasoning, problem-solving, and neural networks. Transformers have limitations in handling complex, multi-step reasoning tasks and compositional operations. They struggle to generalize beyond the complexity seen in the training data and often collapse the depth of compositional operations. Transformers may perform well in single-step reasoning tasks but face challenges in combining multiple steps effectively. While they have impressive empirical results, their fundamental limitations suggest that reaching full mastery of certain tasks is difficult. Transformers demonstrate weaknesses in tasks that require true multi-step compositional operations and struggle with precise compositional reasoning. Theoretical findings show that errors rapidly escalate as the problem size increases in Transformers. These limitations highlight the need for further investigation and the development of models capable of robust generalization and systematic problem-solving. Transformers exhibit signs of memorization during training, as they can produce correct outputs despite incorrect computations. However, they struggle to plan and compose multiple steps for overall correct reasoning. While they can perform single-step reasoning, they rely on pattern matching rather than general reasoning. The ratio of restoration errors is higher than local errors, suggesting that models are able to propagate errors. Transformers excel in low-complexity tasks but struggle with higher complexity and out-of-distribution cases. They tend to guess partially correct answers without fully understanding the task. Pre-training alone is not sufficient to teach models how to combine basic operations for compositional reasoning. Transformers perform better with explicit reasoning through scratchpads. The performance deteriorates as problems become more complex. Zero-shot and few-shot settings highlight the limitations of Transformers in learning without explicit guidance. Experimental setups involve testing different models and configurations. Dynamic Programming and Einstein's Puzzle are used as examples of compositional tasks. Transformers can struggle with compositional tasks, even though they excel in other areas. The limitations of Transformers in solving complex tasks are explored through the use of computation graphs. The study focuses on three representative compositional tasks: multi-digit multiplication, logic grid puzzles, and dynamic programming problems. It is observed that while Transformers perform well on tasks that involve basic reasoning operations, they struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning. Transformers tend to rely on shallow, rote learning rather than deep, holistic understanding. The study suggests that Transformers may have inherent limitations in solving high-complexity compositional tasks and that further research is needed to address these limitations.